Dusan Lajovic vs Francesco Passaro Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second serve performance shows Passaro has a slight edge, winning 46.49% of points compared to Lajovic's 43.87% over the last six months. Could this provide a critical advantage?
• When returning, Passaro wins 43.86% of points on opponents' second serves compared to Lajovic's 42.25%. Additionally, Lajovic slightly outperforms on first serve returns with 27.37% versus Passaro's 25.76%.
• Facing breakpoints, Passaro exhibits stronger resilience, saving 61.71% compared to Lajovic's 52.88%. This could be crucial during high-pressure situations.
• Over the past year, Passaro has won 60.71% of their matches, while Lajovic has won 52.38%. Does this hint at better overall consistency for Passaro?
• Both players excel on clay, with Passaro holding a slight edge at 60% career wins versus Lajovic's 59%. However, as the surface is their best, this match may be intensely competitive.
• On the Challenger/ITF circuit, Lajovic boasts a stronger record, winning 69.23% of matches, compared to Passaro's 58.06%.
• In direct head-to-head encounters, Lajovic leads 1-0, having won a straight-set match on clay against Passaro.
• Past match durations averaged around 1:36:28, with no deciding sets or tiebreaks, indicating that matches have been straightforward.
• Lajovic has faced tougher opponents on average over the last 12 months, with opponents ranked 148.29 compared to Passaro's 191.93, potentially providing better preparation.
• In recent poised moments, Passaro has converted 31.43% of breakpoints, slightly outperforming Lajovic's 29.61%.

Editorial Prediction (September 15, 2025, UTC):

As Passaro prepares to face Lajovic, the stats reveal strengths and weaknesses for both players. In recent matches, Passaro shows superior performance in saving breakpoints and converting second serve opportunities, which could provide an edge in tight situations. Lajovic, however, levels the playing field with higher first serve return efficiency.

Passaro's strong performance on clay surfaces—where they slightly outperform Lajovic statistically—could be another advantage if the court condition aligns. Meanwhile, Lajovic's exposure to higher-ranked opponents and better record in Challenger and ITF tournaments suggests better current form. With historical head-to-head in Lajovic's favor and similar clay court capabilities, the match might lean towards Lajovic. However, it remains likely to be a close contest.

Overall, based on historical data, match form, and surface preference, Dusan Lajovic appears marginally more likely to secure the victory in this upcoming encounter.